Timeline for Mark duplicate and answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2018 at 5:48 | comment | added | Greenonline | Is this some new rule that you have come up with, or is this a norm decided by the community? Do you have a link on meta that refers to these types of "emergencies"? The meta link provided, by jimchristie, in the comments does not seem to seem to state this at all. Where do we draw the line for answering idiot questions that are duplicates? "Is it ok if I cut my brake cables?", "Do I really need to tighten my wheel nuts?", "Should I assume other road users in cars can see me?", "Do I need lights at night?", etc... IMHO, a duplicate is a duplicate, and as such, should not be answered. | |
| Oct 21, 2017 at 1:13 | comment | added | paparazzo | That immediate help was already the number 1 comment. There was no urgency. | |
| Oct 21, 2017 at 0:19 | history | answered | gschenk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |