Timeline for Questions with an answer being edited and clogging up timeline?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 18, 2022 at 14:06 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | Allow non-bumping minor edits, but review them on /review - Meta Stack Exchange is this same question at the top level. | |
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jul 16, 2019 at 8:40 | history | edited | Swifty |
tag edit, not really a bug
|
|
Jul 16, 2019 at 6:54 | comment | added | Swifty | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/120576/… | |
Jul 16, 2019 at 6:49 | answer | added | Swifty | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 14:36 | comment | added | Dan K | Unanswered questions I can understand getting updated with an answer this makes perfect sense, what I don't want to see clogging up a timeline is edits to questions that are years old, I just can't see the benefits from doing this. If it's old tech no longer being used what's the point in bringing life back into it. Maybe keep the questions live but in an archive so if people want to see the content they can | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 14:21 | comment | added | DavidW | Wow, you really won't want to follow Science Fiction & Fantasy then! There are valid reasons for updating questions - link rot, new information or even just a disclaimer "this doesn't apply to anything after 2010" - and it makes sense that once a question is updated that it get bumped in case answers need to be updated too. Sometimes an update to a question will even get an answer for a previously unanswered question. | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 9:57 | answer | added | CriggieMod | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 15, 2019 at 5:05 | history | asked | Dan K | CC BY-SA 4.0 |