The original answer was initially flagged as poor, because it is really too short, and contains nothing new that wasn't in the existing answers.
The edit does add off-site references which is good, but now its a poor link-only answer. These answers are only useful as long as the remote website exists and doesn't reorganise. Link-rot is a thing.
An improvement might be to paraphrase/summarise the info on the linked web pages, so that a future reader can see what they said inside the answer. Leave the links there as supporting information and sources, but they're not the primary answer.
Do avoid straight-out copy and pasting from the linked website, that could be regarded as plagiarism/plagurism.
Another option might be to add your own answer along similar lines. Its clear you've done a decent level of research and that is certainly appreciated.