If they entered this agreement with no user feedback, why would we expect them to do different when they modify the agreement? Also, I’ve been a user on the site for long enough that all this AI nonsense wasn’t a glint in your virtual daddy’s eye…

This answer equates to "They're going to do it anyway, so why should we bother objecting?" and the answer to that is because morality matters.

@RoboKaren BSO is not a "type of bicycle" as in MTB or Road bike or tandem. Those terms identify the type of riding that a bike is physically suited for, and are useful to segregate questions for those users that have knowledge only in one specific type of cycling. "BSO" on the other hand is a generic term for a low quality bike whose use is subjective. As a "certified bicycle snob" 😁, there are many bikes that others find acceptable to ride, that I would consider too low quality to ride. The thing that makes this a meta tag is its subjectivity.

BSO is a derogatory term for a low quality bike. I agree with @freiheit that BSO as a tag is not useful for a knowledge seeker, and just as important to me, its use is likely to discourage people from answering questions that are tagged with it, since they are of known problem quality.

Sounds good to me.

That's pretty specific. I'd probably add a retro-direct tag. And IGH would still work. Or are they external freewheels?

Shimano has a patent for an unreleased 14-speed external drive train. But whether it will see the light of day? Who knows... It would still be worth have to delineate the number of gears in an IGH hub. And since Rohloff makes other hubs besides the 14 speed they are famous for, no, it shouldn't be synonymous, IMHO. The only 2 speeds I'm aware of would fall under IGH (kickback style hub gears). Is there something else you're thinking of?